News
Guilty Until Proven Innocent
Cordova, TN; January 1, in the year of our Lord 2016--Family 
				Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family 
				friendly video games is addressing companies that treat 
				consumers like they are guilty first, and must prove their 
				innocence. In my personal, professional, and legal opinion 
				companies doing this are completely backwards. In Coffin v. 
				United States the Supreme Court affirmed the presumption of 
				innocence. There is not a presumption of being guilty as many of 
				these companies are treating consumers. Here is what the Supreme 
				Court of the United States had to say:
				
				”The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor 
				of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, 
				and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration 
				of our criminal law. … Concluding, then, that the presumption of 
				innocence is evidence in favor of the accused, introduced by the 
				law in his behalf, let us consider what is 'reasonable doubt.' 
				It is, of necessity, the condition of mind produced by the proof 
				resulting from the evidence in the cause. It is the result of 
				the proof, not the proof itself, whereas the presumption of 
				innocence is one of the instruments of proof, going to bring 
				about the proof from which reasonable doubt arises; thus one is 
				a cause, the other an effect. To say that the one is the 
				equivalent of the other is therefore to say that legal evidence 
				can be excluded from the jury, and that such exclusion may be 
				cured by instructing them correctly in regard to the method by 
				which they are required to reach their conclusion upon the proof 
				actually before them; in other words, that the exclusion of an 
				important element of proof can be justified by correctly 
				instructing as to the proof admitted. The evolution of the 
				principle of the presumption of innocence, and its resultant, 
				the doctrine of reasonable doubt, make more apparent the 
				correctness of these views, and indicate the necessity of 
				enforcing the one in order that the other may continue to 
				exist.”
				
				As many of ya’ll know Family Friendly Gaming recently went 
				through a server upgrade with CCGR.NET. There were a few issues 
				here and there. There always are. One of the most frustrating 
				issues was with the email server. Microsoft decided since the 
				server was a brand new server it must be up to nefarious deeds, 
				and blocked it. It took multiple attempts from multiple people 
				to finally get Microsoft to acknowledge we were legitimate, 
				honest, real, and true people. We had to prove to them we were 
				not spammers, or up to some other illegal activity. In essence 
				Microsoft decided we were guilty and had to prove our innocence. 
				Microsoft acted the exact opposite of the law. I am still 
				disgusted by Microsoft’s backwards business practice.
				
				They are not the only ones either. A few years ago I was pulling 
				into my drive way by turning to the right. I had my blinker on, 
				and someone decided to pass me on the right. As you can probably 
				figure out from those facts, they hit me on my right side as I 
				was turning to the right. They got a ticket, and their insurance 
				company was paying for the damages their client caused. The 
				insurance company offered me a rental car. I was reluctant to 
				accept this at first because I figured we could survive one week 
				without my vehicle. I went down to the car rental place who 
				demanded a credit card. I follow Dave Ramsey’s system, and do 
				not use credit cards at all. Since I did not have a credit card, 
				they wanted access to my bank account to withdraw $300.00. Why? 
				In case I damaged the rental car, they would immediately have 
				money and access to get more from me. I refused, and after 
				talking to a manager I left. I had never wronged them, and do 
				not have any record of wronging them or any company like them. 
				Why should I accept them treating me like a guilty person?
				
				I have noticed a variety of companies in the video game industry 
				treating consumers as if we are all guilty of piracy, and have 
				to prove we have legitimate copies of the games we paid them 
				for. I am personally sick of it. I am sick of having to connect 
				to their servers to prove the game I purchased from a local 
				retailer is legal. These companies need to stop treating us 
				consumers as guilty. They need to stop forcing us to prove our 
				innocence. I am waiting for someone to sue them, and have them 
				pay out a massive amount of money for their disobedience of the 
				law. Why do they even do it? Is it because of their greed?
				
				
				God bless,
				Paul Bury
				Family Friendly Gaming

























